Call 330.659.6101 x 806 to order!

(Your shopping cart is empty)

  Home > Legal >

The Legal Description’s Case Law Report: First Quarter 2012

The Legal Description’s Case Law Report: First Quarter 2012

Product Details

Our Price: $39.99

Product Code: TLD-SP-118


In the first quarter installment of The Legal Description’s Quarterly Case Law Report, we analyze court decisions that impact the title insurance and settlement services industries and share those court opinions with you.

The first quarter saw courts still sorting through the foreclosure and robosigning mess that plagued 2011. This includes three cases that were appealed to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. In these cases, the third-party buyer of three pieces of property in Utah, who purchased the property from defaulting borrowers, sued the various defendants who held interests in the property, seeking to prevent foreclosure. The company argued that the defendants had no authority to foreclose because the notes had been securitized, necessitating the approval of each investor in order to foreclose. The purchaser eventually appealed the decision to the 10th Circuit.

County recorders began filing complaints against MERS as well, in an attempt to recover recording fees they feel they are owed. A judge in Kentucky has become one of the first judges to render a decision in these suits against MERS and other related entities. More decisions will be rendered soon.

Arbitration is an important tool in the title insurer’s toolbox to address claims. However, a class of homeowners in New Jersey were able to move their case forward without arbitration until after the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the Federal Arbitration Act preempted a California law regarding the unconscionability of arbitration waivers. After the decision was rendered, the title insurers moved to compel arbitration in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Answering a question that has plagued trial courts in Virginia, the state supreme court ruled that title insurance companies operating in the state may sue under a surety bond issued as required under the Virginia Consumer Real Estate Settlement Protection Act.

Analysis of these and other important decisions can be found in this 31-page PDF special report.

Available FREE when you subscribe to The Legal Description.

Publications   Webinars   Special Reports   The Summit (NS3)   By Industry
The Title Report   Upcoming   2020 Special Reports   2020 Summit   Appraisal
The Legal Description   Archives   2019 Special Reports   2019 Summit   Legal
Valuation Review   » Browse All   2018 Special Reports   2018 Summit   Mortgage
RESPA News       2017 Special Reports   2017 Summit   Real Estate
Dodd Frank Update   Marketing   2016 Special Reports   2016 Summit   Title Insurance
  Request a Media Kit   2015 Special Reports        
      2014 Special Reports        
About       2013 Special Reports        
Corporate Overview       Special Report Archives        
Subscriber Agreement                

Order Information

Shipping & Returns

Need Help?

  • New customer? Click here to learn about shopping, searching, or browsing at our store.
October Research, LLC
3046 Brecksville Road, Suite D
Richfield, Ohio 44286

Phone 330-659-6101
Fax 330-659-6102
» The Title Report
» The Legal Description
» Valuation Review
» RESPA News
» Dodd Frank Update

Privacy Policy | Send Us Feedback | Bookmark Us

Built with Volusion